Void the 2016 Referendum - retrospective restoration of EU membership. See also my other blog as tweeted @AdrianWhyatt

Robert Cummings In terms of reversing the UK leaving the EU, we are stuck with the not strictly accurate term "Brexit" which seems to have entered every foreign language I have come across unamended.

A more accurate term would be "Gukxit" because it was the "(British Crown Colony of) (or some such) Gibraltar" and the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" "narrow" electorates (at least in the case of the UK) who got to vote in the 2016 Frauderendum.  

The "narrow" electorate is those with a vote in UK Parliamentary elections.

The UK, or whatever successor states there are to the UK, will have to negotiate on the basis of the 1993 Copenhagen Criteria (or whatever has replaced them by then), unless it successfully negotiates a full union with an existing member state, joining it, as "East Germany" the "Deutsche Demokratische Republik" (DDR) did, joining "West Germany" the Federal Republic. 

The UK and its possessions Gibraltar and the "British Sovereign Base Areas" in Cyprus are the land borders it has with EU member states. Merger with any of them would be difficult, but not legally impossible. 

Finally the Frauderendum could be overturned legally and/or politically as more and more evidence of the fraudulent and civil tort (i.e. "wrongs" on the balance of probability) emerge, with the EU and/or European area specialist courts (such as the European Court on Human Rights (ECHR), and/or global UN court system, declare it to be void. This would void the UK and/or a successor state or states ever having left, "restoring" it or even "them" to being "member states" as retrospectively as possible.

Under the deal setting up the UN, the then constituent Republics of the Soviet Union, Belarus and the Ukraine, were also granted membership of the UN, in 1945. So they didn't have to apply for membership of it upon independence from the Soviet Union.

Plaid Cymru has used this precedent to argue for additional Welsh Government membership of and representation on international bodies all the way up to the UN for decades. 

The UK remains a net EU budget contributor and its final contribution is currently scheduled for 2064, giving it that to negotiate with, inter alia.

Rejoining (as well as retrospectively voiding Leaving) has never been out of the question.

If you think that this is fanciful, then consider this: a case was brought in the 1980s which successfully got the Supreme Court of Canada to order and enforce the translation of all Manitoba Provincial legislation since 1895 into French, giving these "laws" temporary force of "necessity" in the meantime. "Necessity knows no law" being the most fundamental of all legal principles, of course.

Therefore the debate should never be about whether the EU would let the UK rejoin, but rather about whether all or any part of the UK, AND, Gibraltar, wants to be in the EU, or out of it on the basis of proven criminality and civil tort (aka wrong).

It's morally wrong for Gibraltar and the UK to have been excluded.

That's therefore unChristian and contrary to the laws of the Roman Emperor Theodosius the Great passed in 393AD requiring all laws to conform with Christian law and principles including an integrated Canon law.

I suspect the judges lack sufficient training, expertise and experience to apply the law fully and correctly, sadly, so it could be a very long battle.

Above Response on Bremain in Spain.

Void the 2016 Referendum - retrospective restoration of EU membership

See also my other blog as tweeted @AdrianWhyatt